Subject: [mpls-tp] RFC 3209

From: Mahesh Akula <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:02:29 -0800

Hi,

As per RFC 3209, below is the defination of loose node.

   The path between a loose node and its preceding node MAY include
   other network nodes that are not part of the *strict *node or its
   preceding abstract node.

Is it correct? or is the text supposed to be

   The path between a loose node and its preceding node MAY include
   other network nodes that are not part of the *loose* node or its
   preceding abstract node.

Regards,
Mahesh