Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-vasseur-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-00

From: Kenji Kumaki <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:35:59 +0900

Hi,

I think this draft is very useful.
Many sevice providers including my company use 0 bandwidth LSPs and them
for load balance and fast reroute.

I'd like to support this draft.

Thanks,
Kenji

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:45:23 -0500
JP Vasseur <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Just to let you know that a new (quite simple) ID has been posted  
> proposing OSPF/ISIS Link sub-TLV to advertise the number of  
> unconstrained TE LSPs signaled across a link. Comments are very welcome.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

-- 
Kenji Kumaki <[email-masked]>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls