Subject: Re: [mpls] [CCAMP] [OSPF] draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:24:59 +0800

Hi Lou, Ross

Thank you for your response.

Based on emails from you and my understanding, these works should be done 
in MPLS WG.
Yesterday night, we uploaded framework/requirement document to CCAMP/RTGWG 
and rsvp-te to CCAMP. 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-ccamp-delay-loss-te-framework-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-rtgwg-delay-loss-te-framework-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-ccamp-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-00
It doesn't means we are going to violate chairs' decision.
As you suggest, we will fix draft name having the word “MPLS” in the 
title and post to MPLS WG at a later date.
We will request time slots to present two documents for the upcoming 81st 
meeting.
So it is a good news for us to have complete solution of latency and loss 
TE application based on framework/requirement, 
draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path and rsvp-te document.

Xihua Fu

Lou Berger <[email-masked]> 
2011-07-05 上午 10:53

收件人
[email-masked]
抄送
Acee Lindem <[email-masked]>, CCAMP <[email-masked]>, 
"[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, OSPF WG List 
<[email-masked]>, Vishwas Manral <[email-masked]>
主题
Re: [CCAMP] [OSPF] draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01

For now, the framework/requirement and rsvp-te document should be
presented in MPLS.  Don't worry about the draft names as that can be
fixed at a later date.

Lou

On 7/4/2011 7:15 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
> 
> Hi Lou
> 
> Would you like to inform us the decision?
> Tonight is the deadline for 00-draft uploading. If chairs decide this
> work should be posted to other WGs. So we will post them to a proper WG.
> Otherwise  we have to post framework/requirement and rsvp-te document to
> CCAMP. The work is related both packet (e.g., MPLS) and tdm (e.g., OTN)
> 
> Xihua
> 
> 
> *Lou Berger <[email-masked]>*
> 
> 2011-06-30 下午 08:19
> 
> 
> 收件人
>                [email-masked]
> 抄送
>                Vishwas Manral <[email-masked]>, Acee Lindem
> <[email-masked]>, CCAMP <[email-masked]>, OSPF WG List
> <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" 
<[email-masked]>
> 主题
>                Re: [CCAMP] [OSPF] 
draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Xihua,
>                 For at least now, the OSPF work should be done in the
> OSPF WG.  The
> chairs of the various candidate WG are having some off-line discussions
> on were the requirements/RSVP work belongs.  We should have an answer
> for you by early next week.
> 
> Lou
> 
> PS Please don't cc [email-masked] on mail you send, it makes the
> mail system think your mail is a bounce!
> 
> On 6/29/2011 9:44 PM, [email-masked] wrote:
>> I have a question to chairs and the authors. Because there are more and
>> more documents appearing, we should think about how to move forward
>> these work.
>> What's your opinion? 
> 
>