Subject: [mpls] help

From: Sean Muller <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:22:39 +1300

unsubscribe

From:	[email-masked]
To:	[email-masked]
Date:	22/12/2014 07:14 a.m.
Subject:	mpls Digest, Vol 128, Issue 50
Sent by:	"mpls" <[email-masked]>

Send mpls mailing list submissions to
		 [email-masked]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
		 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
		 [email-masked]

You can reach the person managing the list at
		 [email-masked]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of mpls digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Closed:  draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao (Loa Andersson)
   2. Update:: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
      draft-atlas-mpls-ldp-mrt (Loa Andersson)
   3. I-D Action: draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt
      ([email-masked])
   4. Re: I-D Action:
      draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt (Nobo Akiya (nobo))
   5. Re: Closed:  draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao (Nobo Akiya (nobo))
   6. Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
      draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath as a working group
      document (Loa Andersson)
   7. Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to
      LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard (Mark Tinka)
   8. Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
      draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath as a working group
      document ([email-masked])

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:49:25 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,  "[email-masked]"
		 <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]"
		 <[email-masked]>
Subject: [mpls] Closed:  draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

Working Group,

This wglc is closed, we only have supporting responses. Can (one of)
the authors confirm that they are ready to go ahead and request
publication for this version (-02) of the document.

/Loa

On 2014-12-02 17:08, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao.
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([email-masked]).
>
> There is no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors
> have stated on the working group mailing list that they are not aware
> of any other IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
> This working group last call ends December 16, 2014.
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg chairs
>

--

Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:43:39 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
		 [email-masked]
Subject: [mpls] Update:: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
		 draft-atlas-mpls-ldp-mrt
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

Working Group,

This is to notify that all authors has now responded to the IPR poll,
they are all unaware of any IPRs that relate to this document.

/Loa

On 2014-12-16 13:51, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-atlas-mpls-ldp-mrt-03 as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list ([email-masked]). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There is no IPR disclosures directly against this document. An IPR
> poll will be done in parallel to the adoption poll, and the adoption
> poll will not be closed before we have responses from all authors.
>
> If you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
> aware of IPR that relates to this draft, you should respond to the
> IPR poll.
>
> This poll ends January 2, 2015.
>
> /Loa
>

--

Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 06:57:35 -0800
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [mpls] I-D Action:
		 draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace Multipath
Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces
        Authors         : Nobo Akiya
                          George Swallow
                          Stephane Litkowski
                          Bruno Decraene
                          John E. Drake
		 Filename        :
draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt
		 Pages           : 27
		 Date            : 2014-12-21

Abstract:
   This document defines an extension to the MPLS Label Switched Path
   (LSP) Ping and Traceroute as specified in RFC 4379.  The extension
   allows the MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute to discover and exercise
   specific paths of Layer 2 (L2) Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) over Link
   Aggregation Group (LAG) interfaces.

   This document updates RFC4379 and RFC6424.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 15:12:07 +0000
From: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action:
		 draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt
Message-ID:

<[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Dear MPLS WG,

The authors have published -05 of draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath,
addressing comments from MPLS-RT review teams (thanks Eric, Mach, Yimin!).

The authors believe that the document is in good shape, and we would like
to request the WG to adopt -05 as a WG document.

Here are the highlights of the changes from -04 to 05:

* Renamed LAG Interface Info TLV to LSR Capability TLV.
* Generalized the usage of the LSR Capability TLV.
* Deleted Interface Index Sub-TLV, and created Local Interface Index
Sub-TLV and Remote Interface Index Sub-TLV.
* Updated the responder LSR DDMAP procedures to describe the downstream LAG
member link with rules:
  - The Local Interface Index Sub-TLV is mandatory.
  - The Remote Interface Index Sub-TLV is optional.
  - The Multipath Data Sub-TLV is mandatory.
* Explicitly state how a responder LSR obtains remote interface index is
outside the scope of the document.
* The LAG member link traversal validation procedures is split into two
approaches.
  - Incoming LAG Member Links Verification (what we had before).
  - Individual End-to-End Path Verification (newly added).
* Update initiator/responder procedures to accommodate above changes.

Remaining changes are either minor text changes/additions for better
clarifications or language corrections.

Thanks!

Nobo, on behalf of authors

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of internet-
> [email-masked]
> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 9:58 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [mpls] I-D Action:
draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
> Group of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace Multipath
Support for
> Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces
>         Authors         : Nobo Akiya
>                           George Swallow
>                           Stephane Litkowski
>                           Bruno Decraene
>                           John E. Drake
> 		 Filename        :
draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05.txt
> 		 Pages           : 27
> 		 Date            : 2014-12-21
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines an extension to the MPLS Label Switched Path
>    (LSP) Ping and Traceroute as specified in RFC 4379.  The extension
>    allows the MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute to discover and exercise
>    specific paths of Layer 2 (L2) Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) over Link
>    Aggregation Group (LAG) interfaces.
>
>    This document updates RFC4379 and RFC6424.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-
> 05
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 15:38:32 +0000
From: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <[email-masked]>
To: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
		 "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]"
		 <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed:  draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao
Message-ID:

<[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Loa,

> This wglc is closed, we only have supporting responses. Can (one of) the
> authors confirm that they are ready to go ahead and request publication
for
> this version (-02) of the document.

Yes the authors do believe that the version -02 is ready to go ahead.

Thanks!

-Nobo, Carlos, Kamran

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 23:59:15 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
		 "[email-masked]"
		 <[email-masked]>
Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
		 draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath as a working group
document
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting
draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05 as an MPLS working group
document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
group mailing list ([email-masked]). Please give a technical
motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There is one IPR disclosures directly against this document. All the
authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware of
any undisclosed IPRs against this document.

However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose
this is now.

This poll ends January 7, 2015.

/Loa
--

Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:02:13 +0200
From: Mark Tinka <[email-masked]>
To: "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)"
		 <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
		 IETF-Announce <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt>
		 (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Friday, December 19, 2014 04:14:17 PM Aissaoui, Mustapha
(Mustapha) wrote:

> Indeed the reason I raised the issue in the summer was to
> make sure we do not disrupt existing LDPv4 deployments
> and that we do not need to upgrade a LDPv4 node which
> does not comply to this LDPv6 spec. So, both proposed
> methods put the onus on the LDPv6 compliant node to
> automatically detect a router which is not compliant to
> LDPv6 such that it will not send to that node LDP IPv6
> FECs and IPv6 addresses.
>
> From that perspective, the draft now addressed the issue.
> My latest message was raising concerns about the
> specific method added to the draft and by which the
> LDPv6 compliant LSR goes about addressing the issue.
>
> I hope this clarifies the situation.

Thanks, Mustapha.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/attachments/20141221/17cc4be3/attachment.asc

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:13:53 +0000
From: <[email-masked]>
To: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
		 "[email-masked]"
		 <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
		 draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath as a working group
document
Message-ID:

<27847_1419185634[email-masked]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Loa, all

> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05 as an MPLS working group
> document.

Support as co-author: LAG are deployed in networks, they have to be
supported.

Thanks,
Bruno

> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[email-masked]] > Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014
4:59 PM
>
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05 as an MPLS working group
> document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list ([email-masked]). Please give a technical motivation
for your
> support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not
be
> adopted as a working group document.
>
> There is one IPR disclosures directly against this document. All the
authors
> has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware of any
> undisclosed IPRs against this document.
>
> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware
of
> IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now.
>
> This poll ends January 7, 2015.
>
> /Loa
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

------------------------------

End of mpls Digest, Vol 128, Issue 50
*************************************