Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time as an MPLS wg document.

From: Alexander Vainshtein <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:43:38 +0000

Loa and all,

Support as a co-author.

Thumb typed on my LG,
Sasha

------ Original message ------
From: Loa Andersson
Date: 08/07/2015 20:37
To: [email-masked];
Cc: [email-masked];[email-masked];
Subject:[mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time as an MPLS wg document.

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-mirsky-
mpls-residence-time as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
group mailing list ([email-masked]). Please give a technical
motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There are no IPR disclosures against this document. However, we have
started an IPR poll in parallel to the adoption poll.

This poll ends July 24, 2015.

/Loa

--

Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls