Subject: [mpls] Martin's Comment on draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 20:52:48 +0100

Hi Martin,

You wrote...

> Maybe I didn't sleep enough and maybe this relates to Alvaro's DISCUSS,
but I don't see what,
> in 3.1, is specific to the fact that "i-th next-hop router (termed NHi)
along the shortest path 
> from router A toward SID(E) is not SR-MPLS capable"

Have you had more sleep yet?

I think this is answered in my response to Ben.

Thanks,
Adrian