Subject: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]

From: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:40:43 +0000

Suresh, Thanks for your review and comments.
We have posted a new rev -08 that takes care of your comments and comments from other rIESG eviewers.
On behalf of authors, please see further inline [skraza]:    

On 2019-12-04, 11:13 AM, "mpls on behalf of Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I kind of figured out how this should work but is this formulation used in
    Figures 10,11 and 13 something well defined? I have not seen this before and a
    reread of RFC8340 did not help either
    
    +--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
    
[skraza]: Fixed. Added text to highlight that similar tree exists for ipv6 as well.