Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.

From: Deepti Rathi <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 05:19:08 +0000

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.

Regards,
Deepti

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:13:18 +0000
From: Tarek Saad <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <[email-masked]>
Subject: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Message-ID:
        <[email-masked]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Working Group, authors,
This is a start of an IPR poll in preparation for the WG adoption for draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
Regards,
Tarek/MPLS WG Chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/attachments/20210531/8fd7dd5a/attachment.htm__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RRd5OoNrfYms7fAqVhbdV1U-RnwN9eX7l9vrlz4rP2KA6L-Fbn9P9bjff1e9pfO3$ >

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:16:08 +0000
From: Tarek Saad <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
        "[email-masked]"
        <[email-masked]>
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on
        draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Message-ID:
        <[email-masked]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Working Group, authors,

This is a start of an IPR poll in preparation for the WG adoption for draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Regards,
Tarek/MPLS WG Chairs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/attachments/20210531/2a484d9b/attachment.htm__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RRd5OoNrfYms7fAqVhbdV1U-RnwN9eX7l9vrlz4rP2KA6L-Fbn9P9bjff-JHbtyQ$ >

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 04:20:22 +0000
From: Shraddha Hegde <[email-masked]>
To: Tarek Saad <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>,
        "[email-masked]"
        <[email-masked]>
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on
        draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Message-ID:
        <[email-masked]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.

Rgds
Shraddha

Juniper Business Use Only
From: Tarek Saad <[email-masked]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 12:46 AM
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Working Group, authors,

This is a start of an IPR poll in preparation for the WG adoption for draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Regards,
Tarek/MPLS WG Chairs

Juniper Business Use Only