Subject: Proposed Resolution of LLMNR Issue 29: Valid Responses

From: Bernard Aboba <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)

I would like to propose that the change proposed in LLMNR Issue 29 be
accepted. Any objections?

Issue 29: Valid Responses
Submitter: Christian Huitema
Submitter email address: [email-masked]
Date first submitted: January 17, 2003
Reference:
Document: LLMNR-13
Comment type: T
Priority: S
Section: 3
Rationale/Explanation of issue:

Insert the following text in Section 3:

"RRs returned in LLMNR responses MUST only include values that are
valid on the local interface, such as IPv4 or IPv6 addresses valid on the
local link or domain names defended using the mechanism described
in Section 4. In particular:

[4] If a link-scope IPv6 address is returned in a AAAA RR, that
address MUST be valid on the local link over which LLMNR is
used.

[5] If an IPv4 address is returned, it must be reachable through
the link over which LLMNR is used.

[6] If a domain name is returned (for example in a CNAME, MX
or SRV RR), the name MUST be valid on the local interface."

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>