Subject: NSECX proposals

From: Jelte Jansen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:12:22 +0000

Hi,

do the drafts describing possible NSEC replacements or the 
requirements/transitions documents say anything about how much (or maybe 
just if) these proposals add to the complexity of maintaining zones (for 
example does it make it harder to change anything, or is incremental 
signing still possible)? If DNSSEC acceptance is an argument for 
proposing other NSEC schemes, i think that maintainability is a huge factor.

Jelte

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>