Subject: Re: draft-eastlake-2606bis-00.txt: Suggestion for removal

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:34:54 +0100

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:37:47AM -0500,
 Thomas Narten <[email-masked]> wrote 
 a message of 160 lines which said:

> IMO, we should not at all. At best, include a pointer to ICANN and
> say "their turf".

Not even that, IMHO. THere is no reason for the IETF to endorse ICANN
or to imply that it has a role here.
 
> what is the problem with 2606 that needs fixing/updating?

Nobody documentd that.

> Do we actually need an updated to 2606?

No.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>