Subject: draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00

From: Paul Vixie <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:42:21 +0000

updated text, as submitted to the draftbot, is up at 

	http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00.txt

the old URL is now a symlink to this one.

re:

Subject: Manual Post Requested for draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:57:58 -0700 (PDT)

Manual Posting Requested for following Internet-Draft:

I-D Submission Tool URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/status.cgi?submission_id=6050

Filename:	   draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20
Version:	   00
Staging URL:	   http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00.txt
Title:		   Use of Bit 0x20 in DNS Labels to Improve Transaction Identity
Creation_date:	   2008-03-17
WG ID:		   Indvidual Submission
Number_of_pages: 8
Abstract:
The small (16-bit) size of the DNS transaction ID has made it a
frequent target for forgery, with the unhappy result of many cache
pollution vulnerabilities demonstrated throughout Internet history.
Even with perfectly and unpredictably random transaction ID's, random
and birthday attacks are still theoretically feasible.  This document
describes a method by which an initiator can improve transaction
identity using the 0x20 bit in DNS labels.

Submitter: Paul Vixie ([email-masked])

Author(s):
Paul Vixie, [email-masked]
David Dagon, [email-masked]
Intellectual Property, [email-masked].

Comment:
idnits says i have a 4748 problem.  i copied the boilerplate word for word from 4748 and 3978, so and verified it by eye.  i don't know what it thinks i am doing wrong.