Subject: (NAT) Re: Thoughts on draft-ietf-nat-rsip-protocol-03.txt

From: Shane Kerr <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 15:19:09 -0800 (PST)

Oops.  Proofreading would help.

--- Shane Kerr <[email-masked]> wrote:
> - Including a version identifier on each packet
> seems an unnecessary, since the client must register
        ^^

Please omit.

> - The "don't care" values for the address parameter
> can be made inconsistent by specifying a length of
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I meant, "can be made CONSISTENT".

Grumble.

Shane "Proofreading might help" Kerr
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, email [email-masked]' with
'unsubscribe nat' in the body of the message.