Subject: [NetLMM] #160: Timestamps vs. Sequence Numbers

From: "NetLMM" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:05:57 -0000

#160: Timestamps vs. Sequence Numbers
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  [email-masked]  |       Owner:  Sri Gundavelli <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
     Type:  technical                    |      Status:  new                                                 
 Priority:  normal                       |   Milestone:  PMIPv6 base specification                           
Component:  draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6  |    Keywords:                                                      
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-00 currently uses timestamps as the default
 mechanism for P-BU message sequencing at the LMA.  Four alternative
 approaches have been proposed, and Sri has summarized those in his email
 "Issue: Timestamp vs Sequence Number based logic" on 2007/04/25:

  http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm/current/msg02106.html

 Comments are solicited from the working group to select one or multiple of
 the proposed P-BU sequencing mechanisms for adoption in the PMIPv6
 specification.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://www1.tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/trac/ticket/160>
NetLMM <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/>

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm