Subject: [NetLMM] #171: Use of MN-ID

From: "NetLMM" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:58:10 -0000

#171: Use of MN-ID
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
 Reporter:  [email-masked]  |       Owner:  Sri Gundavelli <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
     Type:  technical                      |      Status:  new                                                 
 Priority:  normal                         |   Milestone:  PMIPv6 base specification                           
Component:  draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6    |    Keywords:                                                      
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
 The current P-MIPv6 spec calls for the inclusion of the MN-ID in every
 P-MIPv6 message.  Is this necessary?

 This issue was raised by Alper Yegin in his email "MN-Id
 overspecification" on Sep 26.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/trac/ticket/171>
NetLMM <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/>

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm