Subject: Re: [netlmm] Few comments on draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-05.txt

From: "Desire Oulai" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:59:50 -0500

Hi,

  I am in favor of th TLV format proposed by Henrik. Other than that, I
went through the draft and it is in good shape.

Regards

Desire   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of [email-masked]
> Sent: February 21, 2009 3:00 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: netlmm Digest, Vol 35, Issue 24
> 
> Send netlmm mailing list submissions to
> 	[email-masked]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email-masked]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email-masked]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more 
> specific than "Re: Contents of netlmm digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re:  Few comments on draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-05.txt
>       (Ahmad Muhanna)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:50:29 -0600
> From: "Ahmad Muhanna" <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: [netlmm] Few comments on
> 	draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-05.txt
> To: "jouni korhonen" <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Message-ID:
> 	
> <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> Thanks for reviewing the draft one more time and your kind words!
> Please see comments inline.
> 
> Regards,
> Ahmad
> 
> > Subject: Few comments on draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-05.txt
> > 
> > Hi Ahmad,
> > 
> > Thanks for the hard work Ahmad. I wanted to say that 
> comments I made 
> > on the -03 version have been addressed in -05 to a degree I 
> am happy 
> > with them. I am especially pleased to see the informative stack 
> > layouts and the ESP text there. Just one question on Section 9. The 
> > last sentence says: "The IPsec traffic selectors will contain the 
> > protocol number for GRE, .." How that would work with TLV?
> 
> [Ahmad]
> I am assuming that the TLV header wont have any impact in this case.
> However, the Next Header field in the TLV header will be set 
> to ESP in the case of transport mode unless I am missing something. 
> 
> > 
> > Regarding the TLV encoding, I would prefer the format 
> Henrik proposed 
> > (and Vijay reminded us about).
> 
> [Ahmad]
> Sure. Will include that in the next revision.
> 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 	Jouni
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Feb 18, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello Jari and All,
> > > I have submitted a new revision which address all of Jari latest 
> > > comments.
> > >
> > > Please take a look and let us know if you have any comments.
> > >
> > > We appreciate your comments and help in reviewing this draft.
> > >
> > > Many thanks in advance!
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is a brief list of the changes:
> > > 1. Removed the (K) bit from the GRE Key option and made
> > sure that when
> > > GRE encapsulation mode only is negotiated, GRE Key
> > Identifier field is
> > > omitted.
> > >
> > > 2. Replaced the text which talks about the GRE keys
> > distribution being
> > > out-of-scope in case of GRE encapsulation mode only by 
> "no GRE keys 
> > > are used"
> > >
> > > 3. Addressed the SHOULD vs. MUST Issue, in the case of GRE 
> > > encapsulation is NOT required BUT PBU has the GRE key option.
> > >
> > > 4. Addressed all comments about section 7.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ahmad
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: [email-masked]
> > >> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Internet- 
> > >> [email-masked]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 12:00 PM
> > >> To: [email-masked]
> > >> Cc: [email-masked]
> > >> Subject: [netlmm] I-D 
> Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-05.txt
> > >>
> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
> Internet-Drafts 
> > >> directories.
> > >> This draft is a work item of the Network-based Localized 
> Mobility 
> > >> Management Working Group of the IETF.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 	Title           : GRE Key Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6
> > >> 	Author(s)       : A. Muhanna, et al.
> > >> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-05.txt
> > >> 	Pages           : 24
> > >> 	Date            : 2009-02-18
> > >>
> > >> This specification defines a new Mobility Option for 
> allowing the 
> > >> mobile access gateway and the local mobility anchor to
> > negotiate GRE
> > >> (Generic Routing Encapsulation) encapsulation mode and
> > exchange the
> > >> downlink and uplink GRE keys which are used for marking
> > the downlink
> > >> and uplink traffic that belong to a specific mobility 
> session.  In 
> > >> addition, the same mobility option is used to explicitly 
> negotiate 
> > >> the GRE encapsulation mode only without exchanging the GRE keys.
> > >>
> > >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-o
> > > ption-05.txt
> > >>
> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> > >>
> > >> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader 
> > >> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII 
> version of the 
> > >> Internet-Draft.
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > netlmm mailing list
> > > [email-masked]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> 
> 
> End of netlmm Digest, Vol 35, Issue 24
> **************************************
>