Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] Open issues that can be closed

From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:00:54 +0000

I propose close the following open issues:

https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/20 Can "revision-label" be used in include?
Resolution: this isn't allowed/required.  Could be considered in a future version of YANG.

https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/21 Change typedef from "label-string" to "revision-label-string
Resolution: change applied.

https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/18 How does a consumer know which versioning scheme is being used?
Resolution: For revision labels that conform to the YANG Semver format this can automatically be inferred by the format of the label.  For all other styles of revision-labels, I think that this is out of scope.

https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/9 The solution does not strictly extend semver 2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed by Joe, YANG Semver does now strictly extend Semver 2.0.0.

https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/7 Do we assume that a module has an implicit semver if none as been specified?
Resolution: Close with no changes.  A revision label is just an alternative name for a revision, so an implicit semver is no longer required.

Please let me know if you have any concerns with the proposed resolutions.

Thanks,
Rob