Subject: RE: [nfsv4] Stuff for issue 18, RECLAIM_COMPLETE

From: "Noveck, Dave" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:12:26 -0400

Perhaps it is bad, but xml2rfc did not object.  That stuff is
unchanged from what went into and generated draft-03.

I don't care if people's browsers can parse it as long as
xml2rfc can.  It is mainly there so Spencer has access to
for editing purposes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Trond Myklebust [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:43 PM
To: Noveck, Dave
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Stuff for issue 18, RECLAIM_COMPLETE

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 13:23 -0400, Noveck, Dave wrote:

>         mvers_middle_filelocking.xml 

Contains bad XML:

If a request (r) with a previous sequence number (r < L) is received,

You're going to have to change that to (r &lt; L) or something like that
in order for my browser to be able to parse it. ;-)

Cheers,
  Trond

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4