Subject: Re: [nfsv4] nfsv4 Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16

From: Jarrett Lu <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 14:13:16 -0700

[email-masked] wrote:
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: NFSv4 WG meeting in Dublin (Dave Quigley)
>    2. Re: wordsmithing for chapters 19-20 ([email-masked])
>    3. Re: wordsmithing for chapters 19-20 ([email-masked])
>    4. Re: wordsmithing for chapters 19-20 (Mike Eisler)
>    5. Re: wordsmithing for chapters 19-20 ([email-masked])
>    6. Re: wordsmith changes for chapters 21 through the end of
>       thespec ([email-masked])
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 10:44:43 -0400
> From: Dave Quigley <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 WG meeting in Dublin
> To: Spencer Shepler <[email-masked]>
> Cc: NFSv4 <[email-masked]>
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> I'd like to request some time to discuss the problem statement and
> requirements for the MAC labeling support. Hopefully by the time we meet
> things will have settled down with NFSv4.1 and people will have had time
> to look at the document and send comments.
>   

Steve,

We (Sun) should participate in this work to ensure the RFC can be 
implemented
in TX. Labeled NFS used to be considered as part of labeled networking. We
tried to give it to the NFS group. The current situation is that no one 
does any
work in this technology area, which is unfortunate. Sun had labeled NFS 
support
before SELinux. Now it appears SELinux will surpass us in this 
particular area.
If we don't pay attention now, we could find ourselves in more difficult 
situations
down the road.

Jarrett

> Dave

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4