Subject: [nfsv4] [3530bis] meeting Agenda 3/10/11

From: Thomas Haynes <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:44:53 -0600

Tomorrow's proposed agenda is below. Please let me know if
you would like to add additional topics.

   Time: Thursdays 12:30-1:30 PM CST/1:30-2:30 PM EST/10:30-11:30 AM PST
Dial-in: 1-888-765-3653 (us)
         303-218-2659 (international)
     Id: 2787108

Proposed Agenda
---------------

+ IETF Note Well Agreement

 This is a reminder that our discussions are governed by the 
 IETF Note Well Agreement. See:

   http://www.ietf.org/NOTEWELL.html

 We will start each week's meeting with this announcement.

+ Item #4: Courtesy Locks

I'm content with the content here. If you are not, please raise specific issues.

+ Item #57: Open owners for which some stateids are migrated and some are not.

Trond opened the issue and no one has replied with implementation experience.

Unless we have some discussion in the meeting, my plan is to go with Trond's
simplifying suggestion:

> I'm wondering if the conclusion isn't just that a client that supports
> migration MUST ensure that any open owner is confined to a single
> filesystem. If the server finds itself in the position above, then it
> MUST not migrate the state for the conflicting open owners on the second
> filesystem: instead it returns NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID if the client tries
> to use those stateids.

+ Last call

This has to occur before 17:00 PT Monday.

+ All other business

+ Thanks

This SHOULD be the last scheduled 3530bis meeting - after Prague we SHOULD start up
a NFSv4.2 meeting.