Subject: RE: (ngtrans) draft-ietf-ngtrans-6to4-04.txt

From: Richard Draves <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 16:14:44 -0700

> IPv6 has no equivalent of RFC 1918 addresses

I think of site-local addresses as being pretty similar to RFC 1918
addresses - would you disagree?

Rich

---

From: Keith Moore <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 19:47:55 -0400

> addresses - would you disagree?

they look similar to me.  perhaps site-local addresses should be deprecated?

---

From: Greg Maxwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 08:08:01 -0400 (EDT)

> addresses - would you disagree?

They differ in that they are scoped. Have you seen how people use RFC 1918
addresses?