Subject: Re: [Ntp] Encrypted NTS cookie placeholder

From: Miroslav Lichvar <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:35:50 +0100

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 06:04:08PM -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
> Would it be cleaner in the long run to pick one?  The idea is to simplify 
> things so they are more likely to work and simpler to test.

Yes, I think it would make things simpler if the draft said that the
placeholder SHOULD NOT be encrypted and MAY be ignored by the server
if encrypted. I don't see a point in encrypting this field.

The same may apply to future extension fields.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar