Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter

From: Lizhong Jin<[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:25:20 +0800

See inline.

> > I suggest reading the NVGRE and VXLAN drafts for more context:
> >>
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-virtualization-nvgre-00
> 
> Actually to be fare on this one I have to agree with John.
> 
> 10 authors and 16 pages to define a GRE key is an amazing achievement.
> 
> Especially since GRE header with MPLS label behind it is used 
> effectively for many years now to achieve the same level of 
> virtualization in number of shipping applications.
> 
> Reference: RFC4023
[Lizhong] agree. And currently it is too earlier to say MPLS is 
non-starter. What's more, it is not necessary to associate MPLS with any 
control protocl, e.g, MP-BGP. When we regarding the MPLS, it is only a 
label, or an identifier which you could define within current IETF 
architecture.

Regards
Lizhong

> 
> Regards,
> R.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________

--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.