Subject: Re: [nvo3] Let's refocus on real world

From: Lizhong Jin <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:07:43 +0800

Hi,
If FCoE does not transport with overlay, then do you infer that FCoE will
not meet similar problem as NVO3 currently defined, e.g, VLAN space
limitation?

Thanks
Lizhong

>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Aldrin Isaac <[email-masked]>
> To: Somesh Gupta <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Ivan Pepelnjak <[email-masked]>, "Black, David" <
> [email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "Stiliadis,
> Dimitrios \(Dimitri\)" <[email-masked]>, Linda
> Dunbar <[email-masked]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:40:37 -0400
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Let's refocus on real world (was: Comments on Live
> Migration and VLAN-IDs)
> The question regarding FCoE is whether overlay solutions need to transport
> it.  I think the answer is no.  If something operates at the underlay level
> than it isn't in scope for NVo3, including DCB.