Subject: Re: [nvo3] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14: (with COMMENT)

From: "Ganga, Ilango S" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 22:13:54 +0000

Hi Adam,

Thanks for your response.
We will update the document as soon as we get responses from few other reviewers and close with them.

Regards,
Ilango

From: Adam Roach <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 4:03 PM
To: Ganga, Ilango S <[email-masked]>; The IESG <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]; Jesse Gross <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Martin Vigoureux <[email-masked]>; T. Sridhar <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14: (with COMMENT)

On 1/15/20 4:51 PM, Ganga, Ilango S wrote:

“Geneve is designed to support network virtualization use cases for data center environments, where tunnels are typically established to act as a backplane between the virtual switches residing in hypervisors, physical switches, or middleboxes or other appliances.”

Thanks! This sounds good. I'd even be fine with simpler language that explains that, even when used between data centers, GENEVE is expected to be deployed in a way that avoids the use of NAT technology.

/a