Subject: Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg Digest, Vol 52, Issue 4

From: Janus Heide <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:02:07 +0100

Samah,

Thanks for providing suggestions/comments, let me comment / ask a few 
clarifying questions for my understanding.

1. Are there any place in particular in the document where you think 
using those terms would make for a clearer/better read?

3. I am not sure I understand what codes you would like to mix, so it is 
difficult for me to ascertain whether that is or could be support by. 
Could you maybe give an example so we can consider if and how to allow 
for potentially additional flexibility? Thanks.

4. An additional representation type alongside the two that are in the 
document could be added, so far we have not had the use for this feature 
and therefore not added it. Maybe a good approach would be to describe 
such a representation in a new RFC as an extension of the submitted RFC?

Best Janus

On 02/11/18 21:00, [email-masked] wrote:
> Send nwcrg mailing list submissions to
> 	[email-masked]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email-masked]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email-masked]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of nwcrg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for
>        draft-heide-nwcrg-rlnc-00.txt ([email-masked])
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nwcrg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg