Subject: [nwcrg] Generic API document

From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:10:55 +0100

During IETF103, the I-D authors asked to have the generic API document be accepted as RG Item.

Comments received during the meeting (i.e., Dave Oran and Rick Taylor, cf. meeting minutes) were: 
	"we agree but we need to have two very different codecs to challenge the draft"
https://github.com/irtf-nwcrg/rg-materials/blob/master/ietf103-2018-11/ietf103_nwcrg_minutes.md <https://github.com/irtf-nwcrg/rg-materials/blob/master/ietf103-2018-11/ietf103_nwcrg_minutes.md>

Work is on-going on having such codecs.1, An end-to-end RLC-like codec is first targeted by the hackathon project that was the focus of the weekend meeting. 2. A RLNC-like codec will follow as a second step, allowing re-coding within the network.

Questions to the list: knowing the above should we have the API document as a RG Item?

Marie-José (as VIncent is an author)
Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
[email-masked]
[email-masked]
+1-781-526-2661
@SocialTVMIT