Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] agenda items for opsawg in Beijing

From: Tina TSOU <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:37:50 +0800

Colleagues, would you like to share your view here?
There was a good hum in favoring it as a WG item. Thomas Narten  
suggested a more narrow scope. So the authors did it here.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration/

B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com

On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:24 PM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> 	Scott's already started a poll on it.  If the wg has consensus,  
> then yes, we will get you a time.
>
> 	Chris
>
>
>
> On 22Sep2010, at 21.46, Tina TSOU wrote:
>
>> Hi Scott and Chris,
>> May we ask two things if you like?
>> 1) Start the process of adopting draft-tsou-opsawg-network- 
>> configuration as a WG item?
>> 2) A time slot in Beijing meeting if needed?
>>
>>
>> B. R.
>> Authors of this draft
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
>>
>>> Scott Mansfield already asked for time
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> ----
>>> From [email-masked]  Thu Sep 16 05:54:25 2010
>>> X-Original-To: [email-masked]
>>> Delivered-To: [email-masked]
>>> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,375,1280721600";
>>>  d="scan'208";a="34889612"
>>> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,375,1280721600";
>>>  d="scan'208";a="512278871"
>>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
>>> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>>> 	charset="us-ascii"
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>> Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] agenda items for opsawg in Beijing
>>> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:53:33 +0200
>>> In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
>>> X-MS-Has-Attach:
>>> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>>> Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] agenda items for opsawg in Beijing
>>> Thread-Index: ActUzwXDu7JXgjhiS/el8VplHx+80AAtdB2w
>>> References: <[email-masked]>
>>> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
>>> To: "Scott O. Bradner" <[email-masked]>,
>>> 	<[email-masked]>
>>>
>>> As draft-ietf-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def was returned by the Responsible
>>> Area Director to the WG, I assume that it will need time on the  
>>> agenda
>>> of the meeting in Beijing.=20
>>>
>>> Dan
>>> =20
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email-masked]=20
>>>> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Scott O. Bradner
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:10 PM
>>>> To: [email-masked]
>>>> Subject: [OPSAWG] agenda items for opsawg in Beijing
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> please let the list know if you have a topic for a opsawg=20
>>>> session in Beijing
>>>> =20
>>>> tnx
>>>> =20
>>>> Scott
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OPSAWG mailing list
>>>> [email-masked]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>>>> =20
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OPSAWG mailing list
>>> [email-masked]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSAWG mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
> ---
> 李柯睿
> Check my PGP key here:
> https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc
>