Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Adoption: draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp

From: t.petch <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:42:51 +0100

A month on, what is the WG chairs take on this?

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren Kumari" <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:11 PM
>
> Scott and I just chatted about this.
> We see that there is interest in this topic, we think it is an
> important topic, and we would like to adopt /a/ document that
> addresses this.
>
> We'd appreciate it if the authors of draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp and
> draft-hartman-snmp-sha2 can discuss how to move forward, possibly by
> combining the documents into one, or selecting one and folding in
> comments from the other.
>
> Again, we think that this is an important topic, and would like to get
> the best possible document adopted.
>
> Warren and Scott.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Warren Kumari <[email-masked]>
wrote:
> > Dear OpsAWG WG,
> >
> > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.
> >
> > The draft is available here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/
> >
> > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
> > adoption by OpsAWG,
> > and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> >
> > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review,
etc.
> >
> > This call for adoption ends Mon 25-Aug-2014.
> >
> > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with
> > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"):
> > If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> > draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance
> > with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more
> > details.)
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Warren Kumari
> > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair)
>
>
>