Subject: [OPSAWG] Comment on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

From: Julian Lucek <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 16:26:02 +0000

I have a comment on the MVPN treatment in the draft. It would be valuable if the model would allow the nature of the P-tunnel to be specified (e.g. PIM, mLDP, RSVP) for inclusive and selective trees. Furthermore, it would be valuable if the model would allow selective tree specifics to be listed i.e. the group-address (/range), source-address (/range) and traffic trigger level. I can come up with a scheme if this is of interest.

thanks

Julian

Juniper Business Use Only