Subject: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering is closed and positive

From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:22:15 +0000

The WGLC on this document is now closed and the outcome if positive.

Authors, would you mind submitting a revised version addressing the comments of Darren Dukes (see below) so that we can submit this revision to the IESG queue.

-éric & -ron

On 30/05/2018, 20:30, "OPSEC on behalf of Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

    Section 3.4.2.5 contradicts section 3.3 on handling of unknown RHT’s.
    Section 3.4.2.5 contradicts section 3.4.2.4 assessment of operational impact.
    
    It appears to me that 3.4.3.5 should state:
    Intermediate systems should discard packets containing a RHT0 or
    RHT1.  Other routing header types should be permitted.