Subject: [p2p-sip] p2p-sip Digest, Vol 11, Issue 18

From: huang-ming.pan at comcast.net (Peter Pan)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:34:02 -0700

The diagram in "3.2. Reference Model" looks beautiful (but also intimidating
like the one seen in IMS).

Very sure that systems designed following this architecture and these
concepts will be wonderful per aesthetics of computer science, as long as
all questions listed therein can be solved (with no doubt).

Me just needing to think about the reason why somewhere else now there is a
system, single and uniform, running also beautifully without ample node
types and resplendent architecture.

Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <p2p-sip-request at cs.columbia.edu>
To: <p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 6:49 AM
Subject: p2p-sip Digest, Vol 11, Issue 18

> Send p2p-sip mailing list submissions to
> p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> p2p-sip-request at cs.columbia.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> p2p-sip-owner at cs.columbia.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of p2p-sip digest..."
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. P2PSIP Concepts and terminology draft posted (Dean Willis)
>    2. Re: What are we doing, question 2 (David Barrett)
>    3. Re: What are we doing, question 2 (Medhavi Bhatia)
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

> _______________________________________________
> p2p-sip mailing list
> p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip
>