Subject: Re: [Pana] pana-pana Issue236: Notification AVP

From: Yoshihiro Ohba <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:08:01 -0500

Received answer from Scott Hollenbeck:

---
There are three things I look for when talking about internationalization
and human-readable text:

1. Character encoding issues.
2. Date-time issues.
3. Language identification issues.

What you've described below covers point 1.  Point 2 is probably not
relevant in this case.  That leaves point 3.  You should also identify the
language being used when delivering text intended for a human.

-Scott-

> Thank you for the response.
>
> With regard to the language identfication issues, is the language tag
> defined in RFC3066 most suitable for identifying language?
>
> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Ohba

Yes, that would be fine.  Note, though, that RFC 3066 is being obsoleted.
This document was recently approved to replace it:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-registry-14.txt

This new document is the one you should use as a reference.

-Scott-
---

Going back to the issue, a solution would be to carry the language tag
in Notification AVP.

Yoshihiro Ohba

_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana