Subject: Re: [Pana] L bit

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:27:37 +0300

I would be in favor of cutting alternatives for
this phase, if it is at all possible.

--Jari

Yoshihiro Ohba wrote:
> When L-flag is set to zero, it means stateful handshake is performed.
> In stateful handshake, PAA sends a PSR without including a Cookie AVP
> and retransmits the PSR until it receives a PSA.  Section 4.3
> describes this.
>
> Regardless of L-flag, PaC and PAA need to go through handshake phase
> (either stateless or stateful) with a PSR/PSA exchange before entering
> authentication and authorization phase.
>
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:30:14AM +0200, Mark Townsley wrote:
>   
>> What does it mean when the "stateLess handshake" L bit is set to zero? 
>> With discovery removed, will it always be 1 within the scope of this 
>> document? If so, I think that needs to be called out explicitly.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pana mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana