Subject: RE: [Pce] opinion on adopting draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-frwk-00.txt asa new PCE WG document ?

From: "Dean Cheng \(dcheng\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:27:34 -0700

Yes it should be a WG document.

Dean 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur) 
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:22 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Pce] opinion on adopting 
> draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-frwk-00.txt asa new PCE WG document ?
> 
> Dear WG,
> 
> As you know, we already have a WG ID for the Inter-layer 
> requirements (draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-01.txt). During 
> the last WG meeting, it was discussed to convert the 
> Inter-layer applicability ID into an inter-layer framework 
> ID, which has now been posted: draft-oki-pce- inter-layer-frwk-00.txt.
> 
> Could you please voice on opinion on adopting 
> draft-oki-pce-inter- layer-frwk-00.txt as a PCE WG document ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

---

From: "Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:11:08 -0400

> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:22 AM
> To: [email-masked]

Yes, 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar