Subject: Re: [Pce] question about PCEP FSM: OpenWait state

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:58:57 +0100

Hi Elisangela,

"Unacceptable" means "values that the receiver is not willing to use on the 
session." It does not mean "illegal" or "invalid."

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "VIEIRA Elisangela 217615" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:23 PM
Subject: [Pce] question about PCEP FSM: OpenWait state

Dears,

We participate in a project called CARRIOCAS (www.carriocas.org
<http://www.carriocas.org/> ).

We take part in a group responsible for the Formal Model of PCEP
as well as the test of PCEP implementations.
Our strategy is the automatic generation of test cases based on the
formal model.

One of our questions consists in identify scenarios that exemplify the
following cases:

CASE 1 : OpenWait State. The PCEP receives an OPEN message, without
errors but "the session characteristics are unacceptable and NON
negotiable"

CASE 2: OpenWait State. The PCEP receives an OPEN message, without
errors but "the session characteristics are unacceptable BUT negotiable"
?

For instance, if we receive the OPEN message with parameters "KeepAlive
=0" and "DeadTimer > 0" could it be considered an example for CASE 1?

We're looking forward to hearing from you,

Regards,

Elisangela.

==============

Elisangela Vieira
Ing. Chercheur au CEA/LIST, Saclay
Equipe Agatha
Projet CARRIOCAS (www.carriocas.org)
email: [email-masked]

phone: +33 (0) 1 69 08 91 33

Bat 451, p. 6A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce