Subject: [Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-00.txt

From: "Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:14:53 +0000

Hi PCE WG,

This draft was updated to include the following:

- Draft renamed to reflect this is for "local" protection enforcement (used to be called path-protection)
- new co author
- Added more text regarding the various use cases / why a user may want these options
- Added text discussing situations of no preference / "no not care"

Thanks
Andrew

On 2020-03-02, 11:32 AM, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]> wrote:

    A new version of I-D, draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-00.txt
    has been successfully submitted by Andrew Stone and posted to the
    IETF repository.
    
    Name:		draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement
    Revision:	00
    Title:		Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP
    Document date:	2020-03-02
    Group:		Individual Submission
    Pages:		8
    URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-00.txt
    Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement/
    Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-00
    Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement

    Abstract:
       This document aims to clarify existing usage of the local protection
       desired bit signalled in Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP).
       This document also introduces a new flag for signalling protection
       strictness in PCEP.

    
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    
    The IETF Secretariat