Subject: Re: [PCN] Fwd: New Liaison Statement, "LS on draft Recommendation Q.PCNApp"

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:56:28 +0100

Apologies, this was meant to be in reply to the email concerning agenda
requests

Toby 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moncaster,T,Toby,CXR9 R 
> Sent: 10 July 2008 16:56
> To: 'Steven Blake'; pcn
> Subject: RE: [PCN] Fwd: New Liaison Statement,"LS on draft 
> Recommendation Q.PCNApp"
> 
> Could I request slots to present the following:
> 
> Draft-moncaster-pcn-baseline-encoding
> 10 mins to present + 10 mins discussion to get adopted as WG 
> item + progress to WGLC
> Toby Moncaster
> 
> Draft-moncaster-pcn-3-state-encoding
> 10 mins to present
> Toby Moncaster
> 
> Draft-eardley-pcn-marking-behaviour
> 15 mins to present
> Phil Eardley
> 
> Toby Moncaster
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Toby Moncaster, <[email-masked]> Networks Research Centre, BT
> B54/70 Adastral Park, Ipswich, IP53RE, UK.  +44 1473 648734 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On 
> > Behalf Of Steven Blake
> > Sent: 10 July 2008 05:55
> > To: pcn
> > Subject: Re: [PCN] Fwd: New Liaison Statement,"LS on draft 
> > Recommendation Q.PCNApp"
> > 
> > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 10:42 +0300, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi, PCN WG,
> > > 
> > > The ITU-T has sent you the following liaison statement on 
> PCN (but  
> > > only sent it to my email address, which is why I'm forwarding it.)
> > > 
> > > Please review the documents attached to the LS and discuss 
> > if you want  
> > > to send a response. I've taken a quick look, and it seems 
> > that the ITU- 
> > > T is making some assumptions about how some of the 
> > components of the  
> > > PCN architecture work on a technical level that the WG 
> > hasn't come to  
> > > consensus on.
> > > 
> > > Lars
> > > 
> > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > 
> > > > From: "ext Arshey Odedra(ITU-T SG 11)" <[email-masked]>
> > > > Date: June 13, 2008 19:44:31 GMT+03:00
> > > > To: [email-masked]
> > > > Subject: New Liaison Statement, "LS on draft 
> > Recommendation Q.PCNApp"
> > > > Reply-To: [email-masked]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Title: LS on draft Recommendation Q.PCNApp
> > > > Submission Date: 2008-06-13
> > > > URL of the IETF Web page: 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=461
> > > > Please reply by 2008-09-01
> > > >
> > > > From: Arshey Odedra(ITU-T SG 11) <[email-masked]>
> > > > To: IETF Transport Area Directors, PCN Working Group 
> > Chairs([email-masked] 
> > > > )
> > > > Cc:
> > > > Reponse Contact:
> > > > Technical Contact:
> > > > Purpose: For comment
> > > > Body: Liaison Statement from ITU-T SG1 Q5/11 Rapporteur 
> > Meeting (May  
> > > > 2008).
> > > > Attachment(s):
> > > >     LS on Drfat Recommendation  Q.PCNApp 
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file567.doc 
> > > > )
> > > >     Draft Recommendation Q.PCNApp, Enhancement of resource and  
> > > > admission control protocols to use pre-congestion notification  
> > > > (PCN), out of the May 2008 meeting 
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file568.doc 
> > 
> > 
> > As Lars requested, please review the liaison statements and 
> > send comments to the list.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > // Steve
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > PCN mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
> > 
_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn