Subject: [pcp] terminology in pcp-base-01

From: Francis Dupont <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:58:26 +0100

Some comments/ideas about the termonology (section 3 pages 5 and 6):
 - we should use 'PCP client' and 'PCP server' in the whole
  document (even it is a bit heavy as the term 'client' was
  specialized this makes it uses either incorrect (so another
  term should be used) or not ambiguous)

 - terms subscriber, host and device are not defined. About the
  last two (host and device) IMHO we should use only one,
  i.e., I propose to change 'third-party device' into
  'third-party host'

 - we need a term for the objects PCP can create. I like the
  'Port Forwarding entry' but it seems Dan prefers 'pinhole'.
  It doesn't matter as soon as one is picked up.

Regards

[email-masked]