Subject: Re: [pim] [PIM] Experimental code points in Join Attributes registry

From: saeed sami <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:16:34 +0330

I do agree with allocating a few of the code points for being used 
without the need to early or permanent allocation. it will simplify the 
processes with regards to experiments .And also as suggested It may be 
more appropriate to mark the allocated code points as private use .
Sincerely
Saeed Sami
On 02/08/2014 11:30 ب.ظ, [email-masked] wrote:
> Send pim mailing list submissions to
> 	[email-masked]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email-masked]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email-masked]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of pim digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Experimental code points in Join Attributes registry
>        (Adrian Farrel)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:14:11 -0000
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [pim] Experimental code points in Join Attributes registry
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
> While discussing some stuff with another AD (young Brian Haberman, to be
> precise) we noticed that the Join Attributes registry
> (http://www.iana.org/assignments/pim-parameters/pim-parameters.xhtml#pim-paramet
> ers-2) has all 64 code points tagged "IETF review".
>
> It seemed to us that it would be very sensible to allocate 2 or 4 of the code
> points as Experimental to allow experiments to be carried out without needing
> early or permanent allocations. noting that the rate of consumption of code
> points in this registry has not been high.
>
> Alternatively, we could have a few marked as Private Use if that seems more
> consistent with the other registries.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of pim Digest, Vol 118, Issue 1
> ***********************************