Subject: [pim] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt

From: Olufemi Komolafe <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:21:09 +0100

The PIM WG chairs asked me to summarise the findings from the IGMPv3/MLDv2 survey recently conducted into a draft in order to facilitate some discussion within the WG.

Special thanks due to volunteers that collaborated to put together the survey and to Tim Chown for posting the survey online and subsequently collating and anonymising the results.

Regards,
Femi

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: [email-masked]
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
> Date: 29 September 2020 at 16:11:37 GMT+1
> To: "Olufemi Komolafe" <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Olufemi Komolafe and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report
> Revision:	00
> Title:		IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Survey Report
> Document date:	2020-09-29
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		10
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report/
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-komolafe-pim-igmp-mld-survey-report-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   The PIM WG intends to progress IGMPv3 and MLDv2 from Proposed
>   Standards to Internet Standards.  The WG decided to conduct a survey
>   of operators, vendors and implementors of these and related protocols
>   to gather information about their implementation and deployment.
>   This document presents the results of the survey and briefly
>   summarizes the key findings.  The survey indicates that there is
>   widespread deployment and usage of of IGMPv3 and MLDv2, with numerous
>   independent implementations interoperating successfully.  No major
>   issues with either protocol were identified and, similarly, no major
>   unused features in the specifications were highlighted.  These
>   findings suggest that IGMPv3 and MLDv2 are indeed ready for
>   progression to Internet Standards.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>