Subject: Re: Error in Path Validation description in RFC2549?

From: [email-masked] (Peter Gutmann)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 18:02:20 (NZDT)

>[Critical extensions]
>Unless I am misreading something, this text is inconsistent..  The latter is
>clearly the correct procedure, is it not?
 
Ah, you've just discovered the X.509 critical extension rathole :-).  For 
more information on this, you may want to look at 
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/x509guide.txt.
 
Peter.