Subject: Re: [ietf-tls] Re: application/pkix-pkipath

From: David Hopwood <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 03:24:17 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Housley, Russ" wrote:
> The registration says: "... an update to [PKIX] ..."
> 
> That update is (finally) finished.  See RFC 3280.
> Please reference RFC 3280 (not RFC 2459).

Thanks, this will be fixed as follows:

Change the [PKIX] reference to

   [PKIX] R. Housley, W. Polk, W. Ford, and D. Solo, "Internet Public
   Key Infrastructure - Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
   (CRL) Profile", IETF RFC 3280, April 2002.

and change the sentence in the registration to just
"All Certificates MUST conform to [PKIX]."

- -- 
David Hopwood <[email-masked]>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5  0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip