Subject: Re: RFC2510bis

From: [email-masked] (Peter Gutmann)
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:53:41 +1200

Peter Sylvester <[email-masked]> writes:

>If not, will some open questions concerning the socket protocol address be
>addressed by something like the old transport prtocols for 2510 draft or in
>simpler way, in particular:

Isn't this more or less de facto solved by everyone using the alternative HTTP
transport, which fixes all of these problems for you?

Peter.