Subject: resend, used wrong email address

From: "Bert Wijnen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 99 14:41:26 DST

Bert

--------------- following is a copy -------------------------
Date: Monday 27 September 1999, 14:21:45 +0200 (DST)
From: Bert Wijnen                                    WIJNEN   at vnet.ibm.com
Reply-to: wijnen at vnet.ibm.com
To:   Lloyd Wood                                     L.Wood   at surrey.ac.uk
cc:   POLICY   at RTP
      rap      at iphighway.com
      diffserv at external.cisco.com

Re:   FYI - Summary of "interim cross-wg meeting"
Ref:  Your note of Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:09:12 +0100 (BST)

Subject: Re:   FYI - Summary of "interim cross-wg meeting"

Lloyd writes:
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Bert Wijnen wrote:
>
> > Here is the summary and action points that resulted from our
> > "by invitation only meeting" that we had in Chicago 16/17 Sept 1999.
>
> By invitation only?
>
> Is the IETF turning into a closed body?
>
Nope it is NOT.
If you look back into the archives of these mailing lists, then you
will find that we had posted this meeting before it took place.
It also contains an explanation why it was a "by invitation" only
meeting, and it also explained that the outcome of that meeting
would be reported back to these mailing lists within a week and that
any issues/concerns/recommendations would be fed as input to these
WGs. This is what we did. And if you look at the 3 "charters" of the
design teams, then you can see that all basically happens in the
open but that we have lined up a few hardworking volunteers to
collect all the data and to try and come up with I-Ds to be
reviewed before and during the next IETF.

Hope this helps/explains (again),
Bert