Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cw-01.txt - comment 1

From: Stewart Bryant <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:09:38 +0000

In response to

http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/current/msg06660.html

 > The standard MPLS encapsulations have no explicit protocol
 > identifier. In order for a pseudo wire (PW) [ARCH] to operate
 > correctly over an MPLS packet switched network (PSN) that performs
 > deep packet inspection, a PW packet must not appear to the LSR as if
 > it were an IP packet [BCP]. An example of an LSR that performs deep
 >
 > Is "deep packet inspection" defined somewhere? I don't see the word
 > "deep" in the cited document.

I propose that we replace "deep packet inspection" with
"MPLS payload inspection" throughout the draft.

Thoughts?

Stewart