Subject: RE: [PWE3] RE: [L2tpext] Re: Local CE IP Address AVP

From: "Yaakov Stein" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:10:10 +0200

Sasha/Carlos

I support Sasha's point of view in principle,
but am not sure that it can be easily carried out
due to the registries being set up via different
RFCs and different WGs monitoring their usage.

Actually, I guess it is time to admit
that we did a lousy job of trying to define
an abstract "PW" which could be based
on either MPLS or L2TPv3. 
No matter what the architecture document says,
de facto PWE3 means MPLS-PWs.

However, is there some way of at least having 
a gentleman's agreement that the numerical values
will continue to be aligned?

Y(J)S

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3