Subject: Consensus Call: A Few More Issues

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:08:57 +1000

Hello,

The editors believe that the issues below have been closed by the -02 drafts (or previous ones); these are the ones that I mentioned as being missed in the previous round. I *think* they should be non-controversial, since they're so old.

Please have a look through them; if there are any resolutions you feel need more discussion, please request that the issue be reopened.

Issues that we need to discuss more will be reopened. The remaining ones will be flagged as `has-consensus.`

See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#resolving-issues> for a reminder about the process we're using here. Even when we have consensus, we can reopen an issue if new information emerges (and that can take a variety of forms).

These issues (and a few more recent ones that we won't call consensus on just yet) can be found at:
<https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aclosed%20sort%3Acreated-asc%20-label%3Aduplicate%20-label%3Aeditorial%20-label%3Ahas-consensus%20>

Cheers,

#72: Consider eliminating PRIORITY region from HEADERS
#73: PRIORITY and Stream ID space
#146: STREAM frame boundaries
#206: Mismatch between version negotiation in TLS layer and in QUIC layer

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/