Subject: QUIC Example 0-RTT Handshake

From: 刘彦梅 <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:44:12 +0800

In draft-ietf-quic-transport-18,
section 7.1. Example Handshake Flows
Should this 1-RTT packet number be [1] ?
Because the previous client 0-RTT packet number is 0.

---

From: Nick Banks <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:53:29 +0000

This has already been corrected in the Editor’s copy of the draft: https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.html#rfc.section.7.1

But, it is still valid for a sender to skip packet numbers, so that sequence was still valid.

Thanks,
- Nick

From: QUIC <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 5:44 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: QUIC Example 0-RTT Handshake