Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 02:37:31 -0500 (EST)

Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-8/💬17)
  1 issues created:
  - Recovery: Execute the previously unarmed PTO to avoid a deadlock (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4830 

  10 issues received 17 new comments:
  - #4830 Recovery: Execute the previously unarmed PTO to avoid a deadlock (8 by LPardue, gloinul, huitema, ianswett, larseggert, martinthomson, nibanks, tatsuhiro-t)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4830 [-recovery] 
  - #4826 Recovery: Corner case for when persistent congestion does not go into slow start (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4826 [-recovery] 
  - #4802 Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 3 (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802 [-qpack] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4790 Defer to core HTTP for 421 status code (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4790 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - #4779 Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - #4775 Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Discuss 2 (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4775 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - #4769 Mandating use of CN-ID is not modern practice (aka Ben's HTTP/3 Discuss 1) (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - #4764 Roman Danyliw's HTTP/3 Comment 2 (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4764 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - #4763 Roman Danyliw's  HTTP/3 Comment 1 (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4763 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - #4761 HTTP/3 authority diverged from SEMANTICS (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4761 [-http] [design] [iesg] 

  8 issues closed:
  - HTTP/3 authority diverged from SEMANTICS https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4761 [-http] [design] [iesg] 
  - Roman Danyliw's  HTTP/3 Comment 1 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4763 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - Roman Danyliw's HTTP/3 Comment 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4764 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - Mandating use of CN-ID is not modern practice (aka Ben's HTTP/3 Discuss 1) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] 
  - Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Discuss 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4775 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - Defer to core HTTP for 421 status code https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4790 [-http] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] 
  - Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802 [-qpack] [design] [has-consensus] [iesg] [proposal-ready] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+3/-11/💬13)
  3 issues created:
  - Clarify Stream ID assignment (by mikkelfj)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/283 
  - linking CIDs? (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/280 
  - Do we need to say more about padding and DPLPMTUD in manageability? (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/278 

  10 issues received 13 new comments:
  - #278 Do we need to say more about padding and DPLPMTUD in manageability? (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/278 
  - #263 QUIC doesn't necessarily expose Stream IDs? (1 by mikkelfj)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/263 [-applicability] [has PR] 
  - #241 Are endpoints the ones disabling security? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/241 [-manageability] 
  - #240 Endpoint cooperation for DoS mitigation (1 by ximaera)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/240 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda] [needs-author] 
  - #204 App: Ref: Transport BEHAVE Specs (3 by gorryfair, ianswett, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/204 [-applicability] [NAT section] [meeting-agenda] 
  - #203 App: Ref: TAPS API work: on TCP fallback / API? (2 by LPardue, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/203 [-applicability] [has PR] 
  - #200 App: Use (and do not need to use) of ICMP (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/200 [-applicability] [has PR] [meeting-agenda] 
  - #193 App: Sect 4.3. Flow Control - we should have a subsection also encouraging timely credits (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/193 [-applicability] 
  - #177 Sect 2.4: MTU or Min QUIC Packet Size? (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/177 [-manageability] [has PR] 
  - #93 Improve and generalize text on DoS detection and mitigation (1 by ximaera)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/93 

  11 issues closed:
  - QUIC is distinguishable, but it's limited https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/237 [-manageability] 
  - Sect 2.4: MTU or Min QUIC Packet Size? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/177 [-manageability] [has PR] 
  - QUIC doesn't necessarily expose Stream IDs? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/263 [-applicability] [has PR] 
  - App: Section 12 on Versioning  https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/199 [-applicability] [meeting-agenda] 
  - Maybe you can link flows sometimes, but not always https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/239 [-manageability] [has PR] 
  - Multiple error code spaces https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/218 [-applicability] 
  - Dated information about version numbers https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/231 [-manageability] [has PR] 
  - Padding explanation needs to mention DPLPMTUD https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/194 [-applicability] [-manageability] 
  - Does TCP fallback require TLS 1.3? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/174 [-applicability] [has PR] 
  - 0-RTT and Early Data https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/227 [-applicability] [has PR] 
  - ALPN doesn't enable use of other ports https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/217 [-applicability] 

* quicwg/datagram (+0/-0/💬18)
  3 issues received 18 new comments:
  - #15 Exposing datagram acknowledgements (1 by quartzjer)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/15 
  - #6 No streams in datagrams? (13 by LPardue, nibanks, quartzjer, vrubleg)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/6 
  - #3 Specify Max Payload Size instead of Max Frame Size (4 by LPardue, vasilvv)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/3 

Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/💬1)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Execute the PTO alarm immediately if in the past (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4831 [-recovery] 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #4831 Execute the PTO alarm immediately if in the past (1 by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4831 [-recovery] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+3/-17/💬4)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - Manageability: Contributor and acks (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/282 
  - Contributors and acks (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/281 
  - Remove line about use of 0xff (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/279 

  2 pull requests received 4 new comments:
  - #277 Wording proposal by Gorry on exposing numbers of streams and such (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/277 
  - #270 Stream ID interactions (3 by mikkelfj, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/270 

  17 pull requests merged:
  - Editorial notes from applicability read-through
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/268 [-applicability] 
  - Integrity check and on-path modifications
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/253 
  - Move "Distinguishing Acknowledgment traffic" into sec 3
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/267 
  - Stream ID interactions
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/270 
  - Update  MTU  to Min QUIC packet size in manageability
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/262 
  - Add reference to quit-transport sec 6 on version negotiation
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/260 
  - Simplify
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/275 
  - Update version info
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/251 
  - Add section references on how padding is used in QUIC
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/248 
  - Edits on TLS vs TLS1.3
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/247 
  - editorial edits on modifications and proxies in intro
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/246 
  - Add "--- back" for appendix
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/245 
  - Clarify and reference spinbit optional/version
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/221 [ready-to-merge] 
  - Tighten up language around 0-RTT
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/261 [ready-to-merge] 
  - Add a sentence on taps
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/259 [ready-to-merge] 
  - Version negotiation
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/254 [ready-to-merge] 
  - Editorial comments from @seanturner, thanks!
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/224 [ready-to-merge] 

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation